Saturday, December 9, 2006

Do the White Thing

No, no, no, the title of this inaugurating post isn't a terrible pun putting across some pernicious racial agenda (although we readily concede our name is a terrible pun putting across absolutely nothing) -- it's actually an opening battle cry announcing the completely cinema-related intentions of Armond Dangerous, the new blog dedicated entirely to, as our subtitle puts it, "parsing the confounding film criticism of Mr. Armond White." Our goal is to gain a better understanding of this pop culture-minded, provocative, reactionary, often writing-impaired critic currently penning head-scratchers for the New York Press. Film- and culture-wise, who is White? What is he getting at when he admonishes critics (often labelled "hipster" or "smug") for unthinkingly lauding films with political agendas while he unabashedly defends the Bush administration from artistic attacks? How does he reconcile the hatred of one of his starred auteurs, Jean-Luc Godard, for another of his favorites, Steven Spielberg? Is White for real or fucking with his readers when he draws polemic lines in the sand such as his now infamous challenge: "It can be said with certainty that any reviewer who pans [Mission to Mars] does not understand movies, let alone like them." Is White the most courageous African-American critic at work today, or a moral conservative unwittingly selling-out to the system he rails against? Or is constructing such binaries an insufficient way of attempting to unravel the mystery of Armond?
Thus, our blog: we can't say we really like the nasty, superior tone and frequent sloppiness of White's writing, but it's damn fascinating and sometimes even possible to agree with. An incisive look into its rhyme and reason may not only make sense of the contradictions of our man's work, but perhaps even illuminate the contemporary state of American film criticism, the mainstream and intellectual strands of which White vehemently opposes or "resists."
Armond Dangerous will operate accordingly: once a week, after the New York Press hits local newstands, our blog will be updated with an analysis of the latest Armond White reviews or articles. This means, of course, having to obtain an informed opinion by watching a ton of the absolute crap (The Cat in the Hat or Little Man, anyone? Anyone?) White contrarily adores and champions, but we're that hardcore in our commitment to this project. The site will then devote the remainder of the week to catching up with White, going into the NYP vaults, scouring old City Suns and Film Comments, thumbing through The Resistance: Ten Years of Pop Culture That Shook the World and deepening our approach to all things White. So stay tuned and drop a line -- Armond Dangerous is as much a forum as a blog, and participation and communication is encouraged. God knows we'll need some help cracking this nut. No pun intended, of course.

92 comments:

  1. great idea!
    armond white is fascinating and thought provoking, but recently increasingly irritating, politically questionable and sometimes out of his mind.
    I first discovered his work in film comment 1992, where he attacks in my opinion falsely overpraised films like "basic instinct" and "menace II society" (as "violent shit"). So I bought the book "The Resistence" and became a great admirer of his critical writings.
    "Whatever Happenend to Armond White" in the last years (rspecially since "The Passion of the Christ"), is the big question. For a long time I thought, he is critical against the politics of his country, but now he behaves more often like a supporter of the bush administration and the iraq war. "Road to Guantanamo" is not a good film, but White simply denies, relativizes or defends the inhuman conditions.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for the feedback. We feel similarly about the "big question" -- what we also want to discover through Armond Dangerous is why exactly White became so reactionary, to the point of supporting positions one suspects he would never prop up if they weren't so out of fashion in largely liberal critical circles. Was it a personal move -- possibly religiously motivated -- toward the even farther right, or did the rhetorical shenanigans of the left send him over the edge? Or is it all provocation? Just more questions to add onto the big one.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Judging by your prose, I would guess that you are very attractive.

    Marg

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sheesh,

    you dudes are something else. What did Armond White do to you guys?

    -Steven Speilberg

    ReplyDelete
  5. Steven, Your Eminence,

    Armond has done nothing to us. In fact, we enjoy a lot of his writing. We're simply dedicated to sussing the contradictions and complications of his criticism. Why, are you upset that anyone should critique a man who often positions himself above reproach?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Folks,

    I didn't think I left the impression that I was angry. Sheesh is usually expresses exasperation. But that's neither here nor there.

    In any event, I can't help but wonder about the intentions of your blog. I imagine it will take an enormous amount of energy to keep up with this blog and being that there are so many american critics out there, why specifically focus on examining the work of Armond White? What is it about Armond White's work that has you obsessed?


    Best,
    Steven Speilberg

    ReplyDelete
  7. dear "Steven Speilberg,"

    Please learn how to spell your name (that's SPIELBERG).

    ReplyDelete
  8. Great article! Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thanks for interesting article.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Nice! Nice site! Good resources here. I will bookmark!

    ReplyDelete
  11. I see first time your site guys. I like you :)

    ReplyDelete
  12. Excellent website. Good work. Very useful. I will bookmark!

    ReplyDelete
  13. ayaqoo You have a talant! Write more!

    ReplyDelete
  14. 3EX9DW Please write anything else!

    ReplyDelete
  15. J8DGUU The best blog you have!

    ReplyDelete
  16. f9D7QJ Nice Article.

    ReplyDelete
  17. actually, that's brilliant. Thank you. I'm going to pass that on to a couple of people.

    ReplyDelete
  18. gNwmdz write more, thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  19. actually, that's brilliant. Thank you. I'm going to pass that on to a couple of people.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Please write anything else!

    ReplyDelete
  21. actually, that's brilliant. Thank you. I'm going to pass that on to a couple of people.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Please write anything else!

    ReplyDelete
  23. Lottery: A tax on people who are bad at math.

    ReplyDelete
  24. A flashlight is a case for holding dead batteries.

    ReplyDelete
  25. A lot of people mistake a short memory for a clear conscience.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Calvin, we will not have an anatomically correct snowman!

    ReplyDelete
  27. Build a watch in 179 easy steps - by C. Forsberg.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Build a watch in 179 easy steps - by C. Forsberg.

    ReplyDelete
  29. I don't suffer from insanity. I enjoy every minute of it.

    ReplyDelete
  30. What is a free gift ? Aren't all gifts free?

    ReplyDelete
  31. Give me ambiguity or give me something else.

    ReplyDelete
  32. The gene pool could use a little chlorine.

    ReplyDelete
  33. If ignorance is bliss, you must be orgasmic.

    ReplyDelete
  34. C++ should have been called B

    ReplyDelete
  35. The gene pool could use a little chlorine.

    ReplyDelete
  36. 640K ought to be enough for anybody. - Bill Gates 81

    ReplyDelete
  37. Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine.

    ReplyDelete
  38. I don't suffer from insanity. I enjoy every minute of it.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Please write anything else!

    ReplyDelete
  40. Please write anything else!

    ReplyDelete
  41. Build a watch in 179 easy steps - by C. Forsberg.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Lottery: A tax on people who are bad at math.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Ever notice how fast Windows runs? Neither did I.

    ReplyDelete
  44. actually, that's brilliant. Thank you. I'm going to pass that on to a couple of people.

    ReplyDelete
  45. What is a free gift ? Aren't all gifts free?

    ReplyDelete
  46. Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies

    ReplyDelete
  47. The gene pool could use a little chlorine.

    ReplyDelete
  48. C++ should have been called B

    ReplyDelete
  49. Energizer Bunny Arrested! Charged with battery.

    ReplyDelete
  50. When there's a will, I want to be in it.

    ReplyDelete
  51. When there's a will, I want to be in it.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Ever notice how fast Windows runs? Neither did I.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies.

    ReplyDelete
  54. 640K ought to be enough for anybody. - Bill Gates 81

    ReplyDelete
  55. Clap on! , Clap off! clap@#&$NO CARRIER

    ReplyDelete
  56. What is a free gift ? Aren't all gifts free?

    ReplyDelete
  57. What is a free gift ? Aren't all gifts free?

    ReplyDelete
  58. 640K ought to be enough for anybody. - Bill Gates 81

    ReplyDelete
  59. When there's a will, I want to be in it.

    ReplyDelete
  60. The gene pool could use a little chlorine.

    ReplyDelete
  61. Clap on! , Clap off! clap@#&$NO CARRIER

    ReplyDelete
  62. Ever notice how fast Windows runs? Neither did I.

    ReplyDelete
  63. Clap on! , Clap off! clap@#&$NO CARRIER

    ReplyDelete
  64. When there's a will, I want to be in it.

    ReplyDelete
  65. I don't suffer from insanity. I enjoy every minute of it.

    ReplyDelete
  66. Sorry for my post .Where i can watch more info about?

    ReplyDelete
  67. ego ops slow environment per working added wo

    ReplyDelete